Kitchen Exhaust Exam · Free practical tool

Grease measurement log

Compare deposit measurements taken at the same location using the same documented method. A trend record does not automatically establish a cleaning threshold.

Free results and workingNo signupLocal calculations
Your inputsCalculated on your device

Example values loaded. Replace them with your own measurements.

Deposit measurements
Entry 1
Entry 2
Your result
↗

Make the numbers make sense.

Enter your values, choose the units, and calculate. You’ll see the result and the working here.

Free results. No account needed.

The method

Preserve date, location, method and units to compare like-for-like deposit measurements.

Before using the result

  • This is a local worksheet. Findings and supplied criteria remain the responsibility of the person recording them; the output is not a certificate or regulatory approval.
  • No universal grease threshold or mandatory cleaning interval is inferred.

Worked examples

These original training examples illustrate the method for IKECA Certified Exhaust Systems Inspector (CESI) Examination. Use the matching “Load example” button above to explore a variation; example values are not equipment settings or prescribed criteria.

1. Worked example

Compare deposit measurements taken at the same location using the same documented method. A trend record does not automatically establish a cleaning threshold.

Compare a supplied criterion
No
Supplied deposit measurements
Measurement dateLocationMaterialInstrument IDMode / measurement methodReading on stated scaleInstrument reading unit
2026-10-01Duct ADepositGauge ADocumented depth method0.2mm
2026-10-10Duct ADepositGauge ADocumented depth method0.3mm
  1. Group readings by location, material, instrument, mode and unit.
  2. Compare trends only within the same series. An instrument scale is not automatically a moisture percentage.
  • Readings recorded: 2
  • Like-for-like series: 1

No drying target, microbial conclusion or cleaning threshold is inferred from these readings.

2. Comparison example

Compare a different supplied condition using the same method. For Kitchen Exhaust Exam, the important check is that the input meaning, units and method assumptions still match the problem.

Compare a supplied criterion
No
Supplied deposit measurements
Measurement dateLocationMaterialInstrument IDMode / measurement methodReading on stated scaleInstrument reading unit
2026-10-01Duct BDepositGauge ADocumented depth method0.1mm
2026-10-10Duct BDepositGauge ADocumented depth method0.15mm
  1. Group readings by location, material, instrument, mode and unit.
  2. Compare trends only within the same series. An instrument scale is not automatically a moisture percentage.
  • Readings recorded: 2
  • Like-for-like series: 1

No drying target, microbial conclusion or cleaning threshold is inferred from these readings.

Check your understanding

1. Which relationship is used?

Preserve date, location, method and units to compare like-for-like deposit measurements.

2. Which assumption should you check first?

This is a local worksheet. Findings and supplied criteria remain the responsibility of the person recording them; the output is not a certificate or regulatory approval.

3. How should you verify a different unit system?

Convert every input to the displayed calculation units first. Equivalent physical inputs must give equivalent results; a unit label alone does not convert a number.

Continue with the matching exam topic

This tool connects to IKECA Certified Exhaust Systems Inspector (CESI) Examination free practice. Work through a question independently, then use the calculation steps to identify where your method differs. The tool stays free whether or not you choose paid preparation.

Tool terms and notices